Reject plan for two-tier community college system

Lynn Russo Whylly's picture

Students’ access to high-demand classes should not depend on whether they can pay extra for the privilege. The Legislature should reject a bill that would set up a two-tier fee system for some community college classes. State and education officials should find a better solution to the space shortage in must-have classes than letting those with more financial resources skip to the head of the line.

AB 955, by Assemblyman Das Williams, D-Santa Barbara, would let community colleges offer in-demand courses during the winter and summer breaks at a higher cost to students. Community college students normally pay $46 per course unit, but the new “extension” classes would charge $200 a unit, or about $600 for a three-credit course. Over the past month, two Assembly committees have given their approval to the bill.

The bill highlights a legitimate public concern: community college students who struggle to enroll in the classes they need in order to graduate or transfer to a four-year college. Community colleges slashed course offerings as a way to implement budgetary restraint during the economic downturn. The Public Policy Institute of California reported in March that community colleges dropped about 86,000 sections — a 21 percent reduction — between 2007-08 and 2011-12. Students sometimes have to wait months or years to get into the courses they need, which adds to the length and cost of their college careers.

Read more

UBTech Conference, June 15-17, Orlando, FL

Learn more & register